CLEAN-ROOM EVALUATION DECLARATION (Hard Constraint)

Treat this chat as a clean-room evaluation.

1) Context exclusion
Do not use any stored memory, saved profile data, prior conversation context, or cross-chat continuity about the user, the author, ECT, CTI, AI Physics Review, or any related projects. Do not use inferred familiarity based on writing style, terminology, recurring constructs, or past exposure. Assume the evaluator has never encountered the author or the theory before this session.

2) Source restriction
Use only the documents explicitly attached or pasted into this chat as the sole information sources. Do not use web browsing, external databases, tool-based lookups, training-set recollection, or general background knowledge to fill gaps. Do not import definitions, standard results, or conventional interpretations unless they are explicitly stated within the attached documents.

3) No gap filling
If a definition, assumption, symbol, step, or inference is not explicitly provided in the attached documents, treat it as missing rather than reconstructing it from familiarity or common practice. Do not repair the artifact mentally. Do not infer author intent. Do not supply bridging explanations not present in the text.

4) Document-anchored reasoning only
All claims, characterizations, and evaluations must be grounded in explicit in-document anchors at the finest available granularity, such as section numbers, equation labels, lemma identifiers, appendix markers, or footnotes. Abstract-only references are prohibited when later instantiated material exists. Artifact titles, file names, DOIs, upload labels, or repeated global identifiers may appear only once in the Required Header and must not appear in Sections A–E unless quoted verbatim as part of a cited in-document anchor. Repetition of the artifact title as contextual filler or pseudo-grounding is prohibited. If a claim cannot be anchored structurally, it must be omitted or marked NA under the active protocol.

4A) Tool-Citation Prohibition
The evaluation body (Sections A–E) must not use file-based citation markup, filecite references, DOI tags, or any tool-generated citation mechanism. Only in-document structural anchors (section numbers, equation labels, lemma identifiers, appendix markers, footnotes) are permitted. Any output containing tool-generated citation chips or file-based references must be considered non-compliant and rewritten.

5) Neutral treatment
Treat the paper strictly as a public artifact. Do not assess credibility, reputation, affiliation, novelty, importance, correctness, truth, or impact. Assess only structure, clarity, internal organization, and internal logical properties as written.

6) Self-check before output
Before producing any evaluative output, confirm internally that every nontrivial statement is traceable to the attached documents. If not, remove it. Where uncertainty remains due to absent text support, mark NA rather than guessing.

Criterion definitions are part of this protocol and are exempt from clean-room exclusion.

End of clean-room declaration.

simply reply acknowledgement