Model: GPT-5.3
Eval. Protocol: 3.3
Method: Six-run trimmed mean aggregation (clean-room evaluation)
Volume 1 · Issue 3 – April 6, 2026
Citation: AI Physics Review. Vol. 1, Issue 3. Open-Access Dataset; Source Window: Aug 19 – Sep 22, 2025. Compression Theory Institute. April 6, 2026.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19438092
Contents
-
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, Claude E.
-
Electrostatics with a Finite-Range Nonlocal Polarization Kernel: Closed-Form Potential, Force-Law Deviations, Physical Motivation, and Experimental Context
Perry, Anthony -
Renormalization via φ⁴ and QED
Totsam -
Spectral Gaps in Four Dimensions: Constructive Proof of the SU(3) Yang–Mills Mass Gap From Reflection Positivity and Chessboards to OS Reconstruction
Reeves, Keefe -
Universal Maximum Angular Speed for Objects in Flat and Curved Spacetime: Theoretical Upper Bound for Massless and Massive Particles
Nazat, Md. Shaikhul Hadis -
Foldy-Wouthuysen Green’s function and WKB transfer matrix method for Dirac tunneling through monolayer graphene with a mass gap
Doost, Mark Behzad -
Band-Limited Relational Time in Constrained Quantum Gravity
Speicher, Cherry -
Universal Scalar Field Theory (USFT) – Version 1.5
Zeciri, Gjevdet -
Wolf-Rayet Mass Diagnostic via Photogravitational Parameter: 43% Deficit Found
Bashan, Nadav -
Intrinsic Wave–Particle Cycling of the Electron: A Bounded Transition Framework Beyond Observer-Induced Collapse
Rezapour, Majid; Rezapour, Ramin -
Hawking Radiation and Superradiance in Hairless Black Holes
Chen, Wen-Xiang
Editorial Note. The conceptual summaries and structural evaluations presented below are provided for educational and research reference. They are interpretive structural analyses of the original works and are not substitutes for the full manuscripts. The AIPR evaluation framework assesses structural properties of a manuscript (mathematical formalism, equation integrity, logical traceability, assumption clarity, and scope coverage) and does not attempt to determine the truth, correctness, or empirical validity of the underlying theory. Readers are encouraged to consult the original publications for complete derivations, arguments, and historical context. Repeated phrasing across entries reflects uniform application of a fixed evaluation protocol and independent generation of each analysis.
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.25
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.25
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.50
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.50
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.75
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.50
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.50
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.25
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.50
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.25
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.50
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.75
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.50
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.25
Comments, corrections, and suggestions are welcome. AIPR is an experimental publication system, and reader feedback helps improve both the review instrument and the presentation of papers.
Authors requesting a correction or an editorial withdrawal notice should submit requests from the email address associated with their ORCID record. If the author does not have an ORCID account connected to their Zenodo submission, they may contact the curator, who will work with them to verify their identity before processing the request.
Contact: custodian@aiphysicsreview.org