All manuscripts included here were evaluated using the standard AIPR structural methodology and meet the publication threshold. The curation applies only to the grouping of papers in this themed issue.
Regular issues of AI Physics Review are not curated. Papers appear in those issues automatically according to the evaluation protocol and scoring system described in the methodology documentation.
Model: GPT-5.3
Eval. Protocol: 1.74
Method: Six-run trimmed mean aggregation (clean-room evaluation)
Volume 1 · Issue S1 – March 2026
Citation: AI Physics Review. Ideas That Shaped the Conversation in Modern Physics Vol. 1, Issue S1 (March 2026). Compression Theory Institute.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19022973
Contents
-
Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence
Pastawski, Fernando; Yoshida, Beni; Harlow, Daniel; Preskill, John
-
Geometric Unity: Author’s Working Draft
Weinstein, Eric R. -
Quantum Einstein Gravity
Reuter, Martin; Saueressig, Frank -
Cool horizons for entangled black holes
Maldacena, Juan; Susskind, Leonard -
Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe
Arkani-Hamed, Nima; Benincasa, Paolo; Postnikov, Alexander -
Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe
Verlinde, Erik -
Theory of Dark Matter Superfluidity
Berezhiani, Lasha; Khoury, Justin -
Complexity Equals Action
Brown, Adam R.; Roberts, Daniel A.; Susskind, Leonard; Swingle, Brian; Zhao, Ying
Editorial Note. The conceptual summaries and structural evaluations presented below are provided for educational and research reference. They are interpretive structural analyses of the original works and are not substitutes for the full manuscripts. The AIPR evaluation framework assesses structural properties of a manuscript (mathematical formalism, equation integrity, logical traceability, assumption clarity, and scope coverage) and does not attempt to determine the truth, correctness, or empirical validity of the underlying theory. Readers are encouraged to consult the original publications for complete derivations, arguments, and historical context.
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.25
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.75
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.25
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 3.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 3.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 2.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 2.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 3.50
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.75
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.25
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.25
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.75
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 2.75
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 2.75
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 2.25
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.50
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 3.75
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 3.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 3.25
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 2.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.75
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 2.75
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 3.75
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 2.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.25
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 3.75
Comments, corrections, and suggestions are welcome. AIPR is an experimental publication system, and reader feedback helps improve both the review instrument and the presentation of papers.
Authors requesting a correction or an editorial withdrawal notice should submit requests from the email address associated with their ORCID record. If the author does not have an ORCID account connected to their Zenodo submission, they may contact the curator, who will work with them to verify their identity before processing the request.
Contact: custodian@aiphysicsreview.org