Model: GPT-5.3
Eval. Protocol: 3.3
Method: Six-run trimmed mean aggregation (clean-room evaluation)
Volume 1 · Issue 2 – March 30, 2026
Citation: AI Physics Review. Vol. 1, Issue 2. Open-Access Dataset; Source Window: July 1 – Aug 18, 2025. Compression Theory Institute. March 30, 2026.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19324681
Contents
-
Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance
Yang, C. N.; Mills, R. L.
-
Asymptotically Safe Gauge-Free Quantum Gravity from a Normal-Bundle SO(10) Embedding
Låvenberg, T. -
Gravity as Temporal Geometry: A Quantizable Reformulation of General Relativity
Snyder, Adam -
Goals as Reverse-Time Active-Inference Agents: A Schrödinger-Bridge Formulation for Bidirectional Control
Anderson, Thomas Orr -
An Invariant Action Scale from the Kerr–Newman Geometry
Delucchi, Daxx -
Temporal Equivalence Principle: Dynamic Time & Emergent Light Speed
Smawfield, Matthew Lukin -
A Single Collapse Threshold Linking Cosmology, Gravitation, and Decoherence: FE = 1 ⇐⇒ Senv = ℏ, Parameter-Free Predictions for CMB Peaks, Lensing, and Laboratory Tests
McElvain, Mason William -
Entropic Gravity via Quantum Causality: A Background-Free, UV-Safe and Testable Framework
Neuberger, Michael -
A Structural Framework for Observer-Dependent Entropy Retrieval Across Physics, Language, and Climate
Cooper, Evlondo -
Modelo Cosmológico Ψ∞
Arcaya Véliz, Juan Carlos -
A Microstructural Spacetime Model Based on Density-Driven Internal Contraction
Büyük, Sedat
Editorial Note. The conceptual summaries and structural evaluations presented below are provided for educational and research reference. They are interpretive structural analyses of the original works and are not substitutes for the full manuscripts. The AIPR evaluation framework assesses structural properties of a manuscript (mathematical formalism, equation integrity, logical traceability, assumption clarity, and scope coverage) and does not attempt to determine the truth, correctness, or empirical validity of the underlying theory. Readers are encouraged to consult the original publications for complete derivations, arguments, and historical context. Repeated phrasing across entries reflects uniform application of a fixed evaluation protocol and independent generation of each analysis.
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
Higher Consensus: 45.00
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 3.50 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.00 / 5.00
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.50 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.50 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.50 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.50 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.50 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.50 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 5.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 5.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 5.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.60 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.60 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.40 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 5.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.60 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.50 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.75 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.25 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.25 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.20 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.60 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.75 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 3.25 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.75 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.75 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Expand: Full overview, Strengths, and MEALS
Higher Consensus: 45.00
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 3.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 3.67 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 3.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 3.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 4.00 / 5.00
- M (Mathematical Formalism, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- E (Equation and Dimensional Integrity, weight 3): 4.00 / 5.00
- A (Assumption Clarity and Constraints, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- L (Logical Traceability, weight 2): 4.00 / 5.00
- S (Scope Coverage, weight 1): 5.00 / 5.00
Comments, corrections, and suggestions are welcome. AIPR is an experimental publication system, and reader feedback helps improve both the review instrument and the presentation of papers.
Authors requesting a correction or an editorial withdrawal notice should submit requests from the email address associated with their ORCID record. If the author does not have an ORCID account connected to their Zenodo submission, they may contact the curator, who will work with them to verify their identity before processing the request.
Contact: custodian@aiphysicsreview.org